Court says no way to cy pres: "Gift" stricken from class action settlement
U.S. Supreme Court to decide whether a Class Action Fairness Act loophole should be closed
“Plaintiffs should pay for the discovery they seek” prior to class certification
Bricker & Eckler partners present at OSBA’s Class Action Boot Camp CLE
On August 14, 2012, appellants United Telephone Company of Ohio (UTO) and Sprint filed their merit brief in Stammco v. United Tel. Co. of Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court Case No. 2012-0169.
As discussed in a prior article, the Ohio Supreme Court recently considered four jurisdictional memoranda raising fundamental challenges to class action law in Ohio. The Court has now made its jurisdictional decisions in each case.
Decision deferred in Hulu privacy class action — awaits Supreme Court ruling in First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards
Legislation introduced to nullify impact of Wal-Mart v. Dukes in employment discrimination cases via 'group actions'
ADA-ATM class action against credit union dismissed
WellPoint settles class action with Anthem policyholders for $90 million