The outbreak of COVID-19 tuition refund class actions is as virulent as the pandemic that inspired them. In just one week, the number of tuition refund class actions against colleges and universities nearly doubled from 60 to 105, most bearing an uncanny similarity to those that preceded them. Their main complaint is that the innovative transition ...
Nowhere is the COVID-19 virus mutating more quickly than in the cozy confines of class action litigation. From business interruption, to gym memberships, to disappointed Airbnb hosts, more and more Americans are turning to Rule 23 to recover losses that are as unprecedented as they were unpredictable.
The halls of higher education have not been ...
Here’s the latest data breach news from the past few days.
Ohio trial courts have needed reminding that class certification requires a bit of explanation. Gordon v. Erie Islands Resort & Marina, a case from Ohio’s 6th Appellate District, is the latest case in point.
Ohio Supreme Court to Address No-Injury Class Certification Under the Consumer Sales Practices Act
Stammco: A Primer on the New Era of the Ohio Class Action
Ohio Supreme Court Reverses Class Certification
Stammco Defendants Respond to Motion for Reconsideration
Stammco Plaintiffs File a Motion for Reconsideration of the Ohio Supreme Court’s Decertification Order
The Supreme Court of Ohio Rules in <i>Stammco v. United Telephone Company of Ohio</i> that Trial Courts Must Conduct a Rigorous Analysis to Ensure Civil Rule 23 Perquisites are Satisfied
OSBA Class Action Roundup: The Latest Developments in State and Federal Court
Ohio Consumer Class Actions No Longer Mired in (Low-) Tar Pit?
Ohio Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in State Farm Class Action
Ohio Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Potentially Landmark Class Action Case
Lack of Injury Sinks Class Over Tainted Water Supply
Ohio Supreme Court Grants Summary Judgment to KeyBank in Class Action Case
United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio Addresses National Banking Act Preemption
Ohio’s Eighth District Court of Appeals Affirms Dismissal of Class Claims in Death Master File Case
Appellees Stammco, LLC d/b/a the Pop Shop, Kent Stamm and Carrie Stamm recently filed their Merit Brief in the pending Ohio Supreme Court case Stammco et al. v. United Telephone Company of Ohio et al., Case No. 2012-0169.
On August 14, 2012, appellants United Telephone Company of Ohio (UTO) and Sprint filed their merit brief in Stammco v. United Tel. Co. of Ohio, Ohio Supreme Court Case No. 2012-0169.
As discussed in a prior article, the Ohio Supreme Court recently considered four jurisdictional memoranda raising fundamental challenges to class action law in Ohio. The Court has now made its jurisdictional decisions in each case.
Will the Ohio Supreme Court visit aisle 23 at Wal-Mart?
Certification battle in Ohio MERS class action heats up
Ohio Supreme Court examines Ford Motor Credit class
Sexual harassment class action thwarted
Class of Ohio insureds lacks standing because of speculative injuries
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. (commonly referred to as MERS) has been the subject of several class action lawsuits throughout the country.
A survey of litigation, from lease disputes to personal injury claims, arising from hydraulic fracturing in Ohio and across the country.
The No. 1 E-Discovery issue vexing businesses and other organizations today is how far to go in preserving evidence for litigation.
Enforcing the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), the Northern District of Ohio recently dismissed all class/collective claims in an FLSA class action—enforcing the arbitration provisions of the parties’ employment agreement. This decision is an important victory for ...
